1000 GPM at 80-foot PWL (BGS) At 5 seconds after pump shutdown: SWL 77 feet BGS. We illustrate the capabilities of acoustic surveillance through a series of full-scale laboratory tests with realistic completion and discuss opportunities for deployment in deepwater wells. The well head water level sensor 100, 200, 300 relies on two physical phenomena to gather information: 1.) the sonar effect to estimate distances to surfaces. For our example: after eight hours of continuous pumping, pumping is immediately suspended and the well’s recovery rate is as follows (beginning SWL 50 feet BGS): At eight hours of pumping: flow rate and pumping water level (PWL). A full- aquifer pumping test at well E7, using observation of drawdown at E7. In essence, this is a miniaturized 4D seismic survey in a well. Three devices for measuring K(z) distributions (the impeller flowmeter. The Well Sounder 2010 PRO determines static water level in wells by using sound waves to measure the distance from the top of the well to the water level. Here we describe one possible avenue-real-time completion monitoring (RTCM)-that utilizes acoustic signals in the fluid column to monitor changes in permeability along the completion. We strongly believe that geophysical surveillance in boreholes has a big role to play in identifying sources of well impairment and optimizing production. This limits mitigation opportunities and prevents us from finding more effective drawdown strategies for high-rate, high ultimate-recovery deepwater wells. The objectives of a drawdown test are to determine skin, perm and the distances to the reservoir’s boundaries. Scarce downhole data from pressure and temperature gauges also cannot unambiguously characterize the impairment. He chose to become a bomb disposal expert and. While 4D seismic can address large-scale compartmentalization, it has insufficient resolution to address near-well issues. After doing well in his military tests, Air Force recruitment told him he could have the pick of jobs available. Lower-than-expected production is often referred to as “well underperformance” (Wong et al., 2003) and can be caused by various impairments: a plugged sand screen, contaminated gravel sand, clogged perforations, damaged formation around the wellbore or larger-scale compartmentalization. For example, repairing a sand control system that failed due to plugging can cost US $30–40 million, while the costs of lost production due to long-term well impairment can be even higher. While this smart equipment can mitigate many anticipated dangers, it can easily fail when something unexpected happens. These wells are filled with expensive “jewelry” like sand control and production allocation systems that aim at maximizing production and minimizing risk. Success is critically dependent on our ability to understand and manage these wells, particularly at the sandface. Deepwater production increasingly relies on a few precious wells that are complex and expensive.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |